This site is intended only for Australian Healthcare Professionals

Search

Menu

Close

Sign In or RegisterLog Out Our medicinesTherapy areasExplore contentExplore contentEventsVideosMaterialsLet’s connectLet's ConnectContact usAsk a questionPfizer Medical InformationStay connectedSuggest a topicPharmacy HubKnowledge Hub

Menu

Close

About JAKi Experience  JAKi Market Experience XELJANZ Mechanism of Action Efficacy and Safety Clinical Efficacy RA Rapid Data (ACR20) Head-to-Head Noninferiority Data (ACR50) Clinical Efficacy PsA ACR20 Data PASI75 Data Enthesitis and Dactylitis Data Clinical Efficacy UC 8-Week Efficacy Onset of Action Data 52-Week Efficacy OCTAVE Study Design Safety and Tolerability Safety in RA Safety in PsA Safety in UC Safety in ASSafety in JIAClinical Efficacy AS ASAS20/40 Data
Back Pain and Spinal Mobility Data
ASDAS(CRP) Data
Clinical Efficacy JIA
Disease Flare Data
ACR30/50/70 Data
 Dosing and Administration Dosing in RA Dosing Practical Considerations Dosing in PsA Dosing Practical Considerations Dosing in UC Dosing Practical Considerations Dosing in AS
Dosing Practical Considerations Dosing in JIA
Dosing Practical Considerations Resources and Support Resources and Support EventsMaterials Videos
Significant improvement in the signs and symptoms of AS at week 16 vs. placebo (P<0.001)1ASAS20 response rates by visit, up to week 481

Example

*P<0.001 vs. placebo；†P≤0.05 vs. placebo, according to the prespecified step-down testing procedure for type I error control of ASAS response over time;‡P≤0.05 vs. placebo, according to the prespecified step-down testing procedure for global type I error control.1ASAS measurement consists of 4 domains (each scored from 0 to 10): patient global assessment of disease activity, total back pain, function, and morning stiffness (inflammation). ASAS20 response was defined as an improvement of ≥20% and ≥1 unit in at least 3 domains, and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit in the remaining domain.1,2Significant improvement in ASAS40 response rates at week 16 vs. placebo (P<0.001)1ASAS40 response rates by visit, up to week 481*P<0.001 vs. placebo;†P≤0.05 vs. placebo, according to the prespecified step-down testing procedure for type I error control of ASAS response over time;‡P≤0.05 vs. placebo, according to the  prespecified step-down testing procedure for global type I error control.1NS, not statistically significant.
ASAS measurement consists of 4 domains (each scored from 0 to 10): patient global assessment of disease activity, total back pain, function, and morning stiffness (inflammation). ASAS40 response was defined as an improvement of ≥40% and ≥2 unit in at least 3 domains, and no worsening in the remaining domain.1,2​​​​​​​Study Design1

A 48-week, randomised, phase 3 study (consisting of a 16-week double-blind phase, followed by a 32-week open-label phase) including 269 adult patients with active AS and an inadequate response to ≥2 NSAIDs. Randomisation was stratified by bDMARD treatment history in patients who had inadequate response to ≤2 TNFis or had prior bDMARD (TNFi or non-TNFi) use without IR. At baseline, 207 patients were bDMARD-naïve, and 62 patients were TNFi-IR or prior bDMARD use (non-IR). NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors, MTX, SSZ, or oral corticosteroids were allowed if patients were on a stable dosage at baseline. For patients taking XELJANZ®, the mean age was 42.2 years old (40 years old for placebo), and most patients were male (87.2% for XELJANZ 5 mg BD, 79.4% for placebo). Patients taking XELJANZ in the trial had a mean disease duration since symptoms of 14.2 years (12.9 years for placebo), AS disease duration since diagnosis: mean 8.9 years (6.8 for placebo), and mean baseline BASDAI score: 6.4 (6.5 for placebo). 
​​​​​​​
The primary endpoint was to evaluate the proportion of patients who achieved an ASAS20 response at week 16. To control for type I error at the 5% level for primary and certain secondary endpoints, 4 families of efficacy endpoints were tested in hierarchical sequences with a step-down approach. The first family, the global type I error–controlled endpoints at week 16, included: ASAS20 response; ASAS40 response; ΔASDAS(CRP); ΔhsCRP, ΔASQoL, ΔSF-36v2 PCS score, ΔBASMI, and ΔFACIT-F total score. Upon meeting statistical significance for ASAS20 response at week 16, the second family included ΔASAS components at week 16, and included testing for ΔPtGA, Δtotal back pain, ΔBASFI, and Δmorning stiffness (inflammation). The third family, ASAS20 response over time, and the fourth family, ASAS40 response over time, were each tested in the following sequence: weeks 16, 12, 8, 4, and 2. In each family, statistical significance could be declared only if the prior endpoint (or time point) in the sequence met the requirements for significance. Nonresponder imputation was applied to missing data for ASAS response rates.​​​​​​​

Explore moreHave you seen how XELJANZ impacted back pain and spinal mobility? Learn more
Δ=change from baseline; AS=ankylosing spondylitis; ASAS=Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society; ASDAS(CRP)=Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein; ASQoL=Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life; BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BASFI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; BASMI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index; bDMARD=biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; BD=twice daily; COX-2=cyclooxygenase 2; FACIT-F=Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; hsCRP=high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IR=inadequate response; JAKi=Janus kinase inhibitor; JIA=juvenile idiopathic arthritis; MTX=methotrexate; NSAID=nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PsA=psoriatic arthritis; PtGA=Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity; RA=rheumatoid arthritis; SF-36v2 PCS=Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 Physical Component Summary; SSZ=sulfasalazine; TNFi=tumor necrosis factor inhibitor; UC=ulcerative colitis.References:Deodhar A, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80(8):1004 -1013 (and Supplement)
Anderson JJ, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44(8):1876 -1886
Clinical Efficacy AS
SAFETY

Learn more about XELJANZ safety profile in AS

 See safety in AS
DOSING

Learn about dosing with XELJANZ

 See recommended dosing
EXPERIENCE

Find out more about the JAKi with the longest market experience in RA, PsA, AS, UC, and JIA

 See XELJANZ Experience

▼This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring in Australia. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse events at www.tga.gov.au/reporting-problems.

WARNINGS 
XELJANZ should only be used if no suitable treatment alternatives are available in patients: 
  • with history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or other cardiovascular risk factors (such as current or past, long-time smokers) 
  • with malignancy risk factors (e.g. current malignancy or history of malignancy) 
  • who are 65 years of age and older. 

See PI for details, Section 4.4 Special Warnings and Precautions for Use: Mortality; Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (including Myocardial Infarction); Thrombosis; Malignancy and Lymphoproliferative Disorder (excluding Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer [NMSC]); Skin Cancer and Use in the Elderly. 


Before prescribing, please review full Product Information available here.
 

PBS Information:  Authority required. Refer to PBS Schedule for full authority information.

®Registered Trademark.

PP-XEL-AUS-1425 12/23.

PfizerPro AccountPfizerPro Account

To access further materials, resources and receive communication about Pfizer medicines and vaccines.

Sign inRegisterAccountSign Out

The site is intended for Australian healthcare professionals.

 

©2023 Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd. Sydney, Australia. All rights reserved.

 

PP-UNP-AUS-0551 12/23.

You are now leaving Pfizer
You are leaving PfizerPro.
You may be directed to a third-party website.
Please note third-party websites are not controlled by Pfizer or subject to our privacy policy.
 
PP-UNP-AUS-0551 12/23.